A Mixed-Method Inquiry into Three Techniques of Data-gathering in Language Teacher Supervision: Video-taping, Audio-taping and Field notes

Document Type : Original Research

Authors
1 Associate Professor Foreign Languages, Faculty of Literature and Humanities, Kharazmi University, Tehran, Iran
2 MA, Foreign Languages, Faculty of Literature and Humanities, Kharazmi University, Tehran, Iran
Abstract
Teacher supervision has been one of the most researched, though debated, topics in education over the past several decades (Baily, 2009). Conducting a high quality supervision can be of substantial assistance in improving teachers’ instructional performance. This study was conducted to investigate the comparative effects of using three supervision techniques of data gathering including field note, audio-taping and video-taping on instructional performances of teachers and investigate the engaged parties’ (teachers’ and supervisors’) attitudes towards utilizing them in language teacher supervision. To this end, 12 novice teachers with less than one year of teaching experience and two experienced supervisors with 12 years of teaching and supervising experience participated in the study. The teachers were divided into three groups each supervised through one of the aforementioned techniques. The results revealed that video-taping technique of teacher supervision has the most significant effects on teachers’ instructional performance. Besides, teachers and supervisors have positive attitudes towards applying this technique for the data-gathering phase of supervision.

Keywords

Subjects


Acheson, K. A., & Gall, M. D. (1987). Techniques in the clinical supervision of teachers: Preservice and inservice applications: ERIC.
Acheson, K. A., & Gall, M. D. (2003). Clinical supervision and teacher development: Preservice and inservice applications: ERIC.
Akbari, R., Gaffarsamar, R., & Tajik, L. (2006). Developing a classroom observation model based on Iranian EFL teachers’ attitudes. Journal of Faculty of Letters and Humanities (Tabriz), 49(198), 1-37
Al-Zaidiyeen, N. J., Mei, L. L., & Fook, F. S. (2010). Teachers’ attitudes and levels of technology use in classrooms: The case of Jordan schools. International education studies, 3(2), 211.
Albirini, A. (2006). Teachers’ attitudes toward information and communication technologies: The case of Syrian EFL teachers. Computers & Education, 47(4), 373-398.
Arikan, A. (2004). Questions to Ask in Post-Observation Conferences for a Reflective Practice. Online Submission.
Baily, K. (2006). Language teacher supervision: A case-based approach: Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Baily, K. (2009). Language teacher supervision. The Cambridge guide to second language teacher education, 269-278.
Blase, J., & Blase, J. (1998). Handbook of Instructional Leadership: How Really Good Principals Promote Teaching and Learning.
Blase, J., & Blase, J. (2000). Effective instructional leadership: Teachers’ perspectives on how principals promote teaching and learning in schools. Journal of Educational Administration, 38(2), 130-141.
Bradbury, L. U., & Koballa, T. R. (2008). Borders to cross: Identifying sources of tension in mentor–intern relationships. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24(8), 2132-2145.
Brown, D. (2001). Teaching by Principles: An Interactive Approach to Language Pedagogy . Addison Wesely Longman. Inc. USA.
Burns, A., & Richards, J. c. (2009). The Cambridge Guide to Second Language Teacher Education. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Calandra, B., Brantley-Dias, L., & Dias, M. (2006). Using digital video for professional development in urban schools: A preservice teacher’s experience with reflection. Journal of Computing in Teacher Education, 22(4), 137-145.
Cameron, R., & Wilson, S. (1993). The Practicum: student‐teacher perceptions of teacher supervision styles. South Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 21(2), 155-167.
Carless, D. (2007). Learning‐oriented assessment: conceptual bases and practical implications. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 44(1), 57-66.
Christ, T., Arya, P., & Chiu, M. M. (2017a). Relations among resources in professional learning communities and learning outcomes. Teaching Education, 28(1), 94-114.
Christ, T., Arya, P., & Chiu, M. M. (2017b). Video use in teacher education: An international survey of practices. Teaching and Teacher Education, 63, 22-35.
Clark, H. (1990). Clinical supervision and the alternatives. Journal of Teaching Practice, 10(1), 39-58.
Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2007). Research methods in education (sixth ed.): Routledge.
Copeland, W. D. (1980). Affective dispositions of teachers in training toward examples of supervisory behavior. The Journal of Educational Research, 74(1), 37-42.
Copland, F., Ma, G., & Mann, S. J. (2009). Reflecting in and on post-observation feedback in initial teacher training on certificate courses. English Language Teacher Education and Development, 12, 14-23.
Daresh, J. C. (2001). Supervision as proactive leadership (third ed.): Waveland PressInc.
Darling-Hammond, L. (2013). Getting teacher evaluation right: What really matters for effectiveness and improvement: Teachers College Press.
Demirci, A. (2009). How do teachers approach new technologies: Geography teachers’ attitudes towards Geographic Information Systems (GIS). European Journal of Educational Studies, 1(1), 43-53.
Eady, C. K., & Zepeda, S. J. (2007). Evaluation, Supervision, and Staff Development under Mandated Reform: The Perceptions and Practices of Rural Middle School Principals. Rural Educator, 28(2), 1-7.
Edwards, J. (2014). Cognitive Coaching SM: A synthesis of the research: Highlands Ranch, CO: Center for Cognitive Coaching.
Freeman, D. (1982). Observing teachers: Three approaches to in-service training and development. TESOLl Quarterly, 21-28.
Gebhard, J. G. (1990). Interaction in a teaching practicum. Second language teacher education, 118-131.
Gebhard, J. G., Gaitan, S., & Oprandy, R. (1987). Beyond prescription: The student teacher as investigator. Foreign Language Annals, 20(3), 227-232.
Glanz, J., & Zepeda, S. J. (2016). Supervision: New Perspectives for Theory and Practice. London, United Kingdom: Rowman & Littlefield.
Glickman, C., Gordon, S. P., & Ross-Gordon, J. M. (2001). Supervision and instructional leadership: A developmental approach: Retrived from: https://eric.ed.gov
Glickman, C., Gordon, S. P., & Ross-Gordon, J. M. (2005). The basic guide to supervision and teaching leadership. Boston, MA: Allyn &c Bacon.
Goldsberry, L. (1988). Three functional methods of supervision. Action in teacher education, 10(1), 1-10.
Grissom, J. A., Loeb, S., & Master, B. (2013). Effective instructional time use for school leaders longitudinal evidence from observations of principals. Educational Researcher, 0013189X13510020.
Gruenhagen, K., McCracken, T., & True, J. (1999). Using distance education technologies for the supervision of student teachers in remote rural schools. Rural Special Education Quarterly, 18, 58-65.
Harris, D. N., & Sass, T. R. (2011). Teacher training, teacher quality and student achievement. Journal of Public Economics, 95(7), 798-812.
Hooton, N. K. (2008). The design of post-observation feedback and its impact on student teachers Professional encounters in TESOL (pp. 24-41): Springer.
Ibrahim, A. S. (2013). Approaches to supervision of student teachers in one UAE teacher education program. Teaching and Teacher Education, 34, 38-45.
Imig, D. G., & Imig, S. R. (2006). The teacher effectiveness movement: How 80 years of essentialist control have shaped the teacher education profession. Journal of Teacher Education, 57(2), 167-180.
Kinzie, M. B., & Delcourt, M. A. (1991). Computer technologies in teacher education: The measurement of attitudes and self-efficacy.
Kleinknecht, M., & Schneider, J. (2013). What do teachers think and feel when analyzing videos of themselves and other teachers teaching? Teaching and Teacher Education, 33, 13-23.
Mann, S. J., & Copland, F. (2010). Dialogic talk in the post-observation conference: an investment for reflection.
Marzano, R. J., Frontier, T., & Livingston, D. (2011). Effective supervision: Supporting the art and science of teaching . Alexandria, VA: ASCD.
McDonough, J., & McDonough, S. (2014). Research methods for English language teachers: Routledge.
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: A sourcebook. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.
Oliva, P. F., & Pawlas, G. (2001). Supervision for today‘s school . New York: John Willey & Sons: Inc.
Oliva, P. F., & Pawlas, G. E. (2004). Supervision for today's schools. Retrived from: https://eric.ed.gov
Patton, M. Q. (2002). Two decades of developments in qualitative inquiry a personal, experiential perspective. Qualitative social work, 1(3), 261-283.
Stark, M. D., McGhee, M. W., & Jimerson, J. B. (2016). Reclaiming Instructional Supervision: Using Solution-Focused Strategies to Promote Teacher Development. Journal of Research on Leadership Education, 1942775116684895.
Sullivan, S., & Glanz, J. (2000). Alternative Approaches to Supervision: Cases from the Field. Journal of curriculum and supervision, 15(3), 212-235.
Tang, S. Y. F., & Chow, A. W. K. (2007). Communicating feedback in teaching practice supervision in a learning-oriented field experience assessment framework. Teaching and Teacher Education, 23(7), 1066-1085.
Teo, T. (2008). Pre-service teachers' attitudes towards computer use: A Singapore survey. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 24(4).
Thomson, W. S., & Hawk, P. P. (1996). PROJECT DIST-ED: teleconferencing as a means of supporting and assisting beginning teachers. Action in teacher education, 17(4), 9-17.
Tripp, T., & Rich, P. (2012a). The influence of video analysis on the process of teacher change. Teaching and Teacher Education, 28(5), 728-739.
Tripp, T., & Rich, P. (2012b). Using video to analyze one's own teaching. British Journal of Educational Technology, 43(4), 678-704.
UNESCO. (1996). Learning: The Treasure Within. Report to UNESCO of the International Commission of Education For the Twenty-First Century. Retrieved from Paris:
Van Es, E. A. (2012). Examining the development of a teacher learning community: The case of a video club. Teaching and Teacher Education, 28(2), 182-192.
Vásquez, C. (2004). “Very carefully managed”: Advice and suggestions in post-observation meetings. Linguistics and education, 15(1), 33-58.
Vásquez, C., & Reppen, R. (2007). Transforming practice: Changing patterns of participation in post-observation meetings. Language Awareness, 16(3), 153-172.
Wajnryb, R. (1998). Telling it like it isn't—exploring an instance of pragmatic ambivalence in supervisory discourse. Journal of Pragmatics, 29(5), 531-544.
Wanzare, Z. (2012). Instructional supervision in public secondary schools in Kenya. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 40(2), 188-216.
Zepeda, S. J. (2007). The principal as instructional leader: A handbook for supervisors. Larchmont, NY: Eye on Education. Inc. APPENDICES.
Zepeda, S. J. (2012). Instructional supervision: Applying tools and concepts. Larchmont, NY: Eye on Education.