Macro and Micro Motivational Strategies Used in EFL Classrooms: A Case of Iranian EFL Teachers

Document Type : Original Research

Authors
1 Assistant professor of TEFL, University of Mazandaran, Mazandaran, Iran
2 Ph.D Candidate, Azad University, North Branch, Tehran, Iran
Abstract
Literature review shows that there has been a plethora of studies on English as a Foreign Language (EFL) teachers' motivation for teaching and the role which they play in motivating learners. However, it seems that types of motivational strategies employed by EFL teachers to motivate EFL learners in language institutes in Iran have not been sufficiently studied. In so doing, a qualitative research method was used and 25 EFL teachers who were selected through purposive sampling were interviewed. The interviews were transcribed and analyzed thematically. Results showed that EFL teachers use six macro strategies: L2 related values, teaching behaviors/teaching styles, appreciating learners' effort, prompting learner autonomy, Classroom atmosphere, and increasing learners' confidence. Each macro-strategy consists of several micro-strategies. Totally, 36 micro-strategies are used by EFL teachers to motivate EFL learners. It can be concluded that besides establishing and creating appropriate learning conditions, EFL teachers use both instrumental and integrative motivations to motivate EFL learners.

Keywords

Subjects


Alavi, S.M., &Mehmandoust, Z. (2011). An exploration of sources of foreign language teacher motivation in Iran. The Journal of Applied Linguistics, 2(4), 25-48.
Alam, M.T. &Farid, S. (2011). Factors affecting teachers’ motivation. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 2 (1), 20-45.
Alrabai, F. A. (2011). Motivational instruction in practice: Do EFL instructors at King Khalid University motivate their students to learn English as a foreign language? Arab World English Journal, 2(4), 257-285.
Alshehri, E, & Etherington , M.S. (2017). Motivational strategies: The perceptions of EFL teachers and students in the Saudi higher education context. International Journal of English Language Education, 5(2), 46-81.
Assor, A., Kaplan, H., & Roth, G. (2002). Choice is good, but relevant is excellent: Autonomy-enhancing and suppressing teacher behaviors predicting students’ engagement in school work. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 72, 262-278.
Atkinson, E. S. (2000). An investigation into the relationship between teacher motivation and pupil motivation. Educational Psychology, 20(1), 45-57.
Bernaus, M., Wilson, A., & Gardner, R. C. (2009). Teachers’ motivation, classroom strategy use, students’ motivation and second language achievement. PortaLinguarum, 12, 25-36.
Brophy, J. (2004). Motivating students to learn (2nd ed.). Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Butz, N. T., Stupnisky, R. H., Peterson, E. S., &Majerious, M. M. (2014). Motivation in Synchronous Hybrid Graduate Business Programs: a self-determination approach to contrasting online and on-campus students. Journal of Online Learning & Teaching, 10(2), 211-227.
Cheng, H., &Dörnyei, Z. (2007). The use of motivational strategies in language instruction: The case of EFL teaching in Taiwan. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 1(1), 153-174.
Chemolli, E., &Gagné, M. (2014). Evidence against the continuum structure underlying motivation measures derived from self-determination theory. Psychological Assessment, 26(2), 575-585.
Dörnyei, Z. (2005). The psychology of the language learner: Individual differences in
Second language acquisition. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Dörnyei, Z., Csizér, K., &Németh, N. (2006).Motivation, language, attitudes and globalisation: Book, motivation, language, attitudes. Canada: Multilingual Matters LTD.
Dörnyei, Z., &Ushioda, E. (2011).Teaching and researching motivation (2nd edition). Great Britain: Pearson Education Limited.
Dörnyei, Z., &Csizér, K. (1998). Ten Commandments for motivating language learners: Results of an empirical study. Language Teaching Research, 2(3), 203-229.
Eccles, J. S. (2007). Subjective task value and the Eccles et al. model of achievement related values. In A. J. Elliot & C. S. Dweck (Eds), Handbook of competence and motivation (pp. 105-121). London: The Guilford Press.
Gardner, R. C. (2005). Integrative motivation and second language acquisition. Joint Plenary Talk presented at Canadian Association of Applied Linguistics/Canadian Linguistics Association, London, Ontario.
Gardner, R. C. (2007). Motivation and second language acquisition. PortaLinguarum, 8: 9- 20.
Garn, A., & Jolly. J. L. (2014). High ability students’ voices on learning motivation. Journal of Advanced Academics, 25(1), 7-24.
Guilloteaux, M. J. (2013). Motivational strategies for the language classroom: Perceptions of Korean secondary school English teachers. System, 41(1), 3-14.
Guilloteaux, M. J., &Dörnyei, Z. (2008). Motivating language learners: A classroom-oriented investigation of the effects of motivational strategies on student motivation. TESOL Quarterly, 42(1), 55-77.
Janati, M., Marzban, A. (2014). The Relationship between Iranian EFL learners’ motivation and their English proficiency level. Journal of Studies in Learning and Teaching English, 2(6) 65-79
Jang, H., Kim, E. J., & Reeve, J. (2012). Longitudinal test of self-determination theory’s motivation mediation model in a naturally occurring classroom context. Journal of Education Psychology, 104, 1175-1188.
Jang, H., Reeve, J., & Deci, E. L. (2010). Engaging students in learning activities: It is not autonomy support or structure but autonomy support and structure. American Psychological Association, 102(3), 588-600.
Lamb, M. (2004). Integrative motivation in a globalizing world. System, 32(1), 3-19.
Lamb, E. (2011). Fragile identities: Exploring learner identity, learner autonomy and motivation through young learners’ voices. The Canadian Journal of Applied Linguistics, Special Issue, 14(2), 68-85.
Loima, J., & Vibulphol, J. (2014). Internal interest or external performing? A Qualitative study on motivation and learning of 9th graders in Thailand basic education. Journal of Education and Learning, 3(3), 194-203.
Loima, J., & Vibulphol, J. (2016). Learning and motivation in Thailand: A comparative regional study on basic education ninth graders. International Education Studies, 9(1), 31-43.
Martin, A. L., & Laurie, I. (1993). Student views about contributions of literary and cultural content to language learning at intermediate level. Foreign Language Annals, 26, (2), 188-207.
Martin, J. L. O., &Escabias, E. R. (2007). Motivating factors in the students of FLL (English) at the Faculty of Education University of Granada. International Journal of Learning, 13(9), 1-15.
Moskovsky, C., &Alrabai, F. (2009). Intrinsic Motivation in Saudi Learners of English as a Foreign Language. The Open Applied Linguistics Journal, 2(1), 1-10. Retrieved from http://www.benthamscience.com/
Moskovsky, C., Alrabai, F., Paolini, S., &Ratcheva, S. (2013). The effects of teachers’ motivational strategies on learners’ motivation: A controlled investigation of second language acquisition. Language Learning, 63(1), 34-62.
Niemiec, C. P., & Ryan, R. M. (2009). Autonomy, competence, and relatedness in the classroom: Applying self-determination theory to educational practice. Theory and Research in Education, 7(2), 133-144.
Oxford, R., &Shearin, J. (1994). Language learning motivation: Expanding the theoretical framework. Modern language Journal, 78, 12-28
Reeve, J. (2009). Why teachers adopt a controlling motivating style toward students and how they can become more autonomy supportive. Educational Psychologist, 44(3), 159-175.
Papi, M., & Abdollahzadeh, E. (2012). Teacher motivational practice, student motivation, and possible L2 selves: An examination in the Iranian EFL context. Language Learning, 62(2), 571-592.
Ryan, R. M., &Deci, E. L. (2000). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 54-67.
Ruesch, A., Bown, J., & Dewey, D. P. (2012). Student and teacher perceptions of motivational strategies in the foreign language classroom. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 6(1), 15-27.
Suryanti Tambunan, A. R., Abdul Hamid, F., Sundayana, W. (2016). The urban EFL teachers’ motivation in Indonesia: Maslow’s hierarchy of needs theory and Herzberg’s motivational hygiene theory. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 6(9), 115-122.
Trang, T., & Baldauf, R. B. (2007). Demotivation: Understanding resistance to English language learning: The case of Vietnamese students. The Journal of Asia TEFL, 4(1), 79-105.
Tuysuz M, Yildiran D, Demirci N. (2010). What is the motivation difference between university students and high school students? Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2 , 1543–1548.
Ushioda, E. (2009). A person-in-context relational view of emergent motivation, self and Identity. In Dornyei, Z. andUshioda, E. (eds), Motivation, Language Identity and the L2 Self. Bristol: Multilingual Matters, pp. 215-228.
Weiner, B. (2007). Motivation from an attribution perspective and the social psychology of perceived competence. In A. J. Elliot & C. S. Dweck (Eds), Handbook of competence and motivation (73-104). New York: The Guilford Press.
Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J. (1992). The development of achievement task values: A theoretical analysis. Developmental Review, 12(3), 265-310.
Zhang, Q., & Sapp, D.A. (2008). A burning issue in Teaching: The Impact of teacher burnout and nonverbal immediacy on student motivation and affective learning. Journal of Communication Studies, 1(2), 152 – 68.
Ziahosseini, S. M., &Salehi, M. (2007). An Investigation of the Relationship between Motivation and Language Learning Strategies. Pazhuhesh-e Zabanha-ye Khareji, 41(Special Issue), 85-107.