[1] Akour, H., (2009). “Determinants of Mobile Learning Acceptance: An Empirical Investigation in Higher Education” (Doctoral thesis, Oklahoma State University).
[2] Al-Somali, S. A., Gholami, R., & Clegg, B., (2009). An investigation into the acceptance of online banking in Saudi Arabia. Technovation, 29(2), 130–141.
[3] Atai, M. R. & Dashtestani, R., (2013). Iranian English for academic purposes (EAP) stakeholders' attitudes toward using the Internet in EAP courses for civil engineering students: promises and challenges. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 26(1), 21-38.
[4] Atai, M. R. & Nazari, O., (2011). Exploring reading comprehension needs of Iranian EAP students of health information management (HIM): A triangulated approach. System, 39(1), 30-43.doi:10.1016/j.system.2011.01.015
[5] Atai, M. R. & Tahririan, M. H., (2003). Assessment of the ESP status in the current Iranian higher education system. LSP 2000, Communication, Culture and Knowledge, University of Surrey, Guilford, UK.
[6] Atai, M.R., (2006). EAP teacher education: Searching for an effective model integrating content and language teachers’ schemes. In Proceedings of PAAL Conference, Kangwong National University, Chuncheon, Korea.
[7] Ajzen, I. & Fishbein, M., (1975). Attitude-behavior relations: A theoretical analysis and review of empirical research. Psychological Bulletin, 84(5), 888-918.
[8] Aydin, S., (2013). Teachers’ perceptions about the use of computers in EFL teaching and learning: the case of Turkey. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 26(3), 214-233. doi:10.1080/09588221.2012.654495
[9] Bandura, A., (1982). Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. American psychologist, 37(2), 122-147.
[10] Byrne, J., & Diem, R., (2014). Profiling mobile English language learners. Jalt CalL Journal,
10 (1), 3–19.
[11] Callum, K. M., Jeffrey,L. & Kinshuk (2014). Comparing the role of ICT literacy and anxiety in the adoption of mobile learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 39, 8–19.
[12] Chen, H. & Tseng, H., (2012). Factors that influence acceptance of web based e learning systems for the in service education of junior high school teachers in Taiwan. Evaluation and Program Planning, 35, 398–406.
[13] Chiu, K. F. , Churchill, D., (2015). Adoption of mobile devices in teaching: changes in teacher beliefs, attitudes and anxiety. Interactive Learning Environments. doi:10.1080/10494820.2015.1113709
[14] Cresswell, J. W., (2009). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. Los Angeles: Sage Publication.
[15] Celik, V. & Yesilyurt, E., (2013). Attitudes to technology, perceived computer self-efficacy and computer anxiety as predictors of computer supported education. Computers & Education, 60, 148-158.
[16] Dashtestani, R., (2012). Barriers to the implementation of CALL in EFL courses: Iranian EFL teachers’ attitudes and perspectives. The Jalt Call Journal, 8(2), 55-70.
[17] Dashtestani, R., (2014). English as a foreign language: teachers’ perspectives on implementing online instruction in the Iranian EFL context. Research in Learning Technology, 22, http://dx.doi.org/10.3402/rlt.v22.20142
[18] Dashtestani, R., (2015). Moving bravely towards mobile learning: Iranian students’ use of mobile devices for learning English as a foreign language. Computer Assisted Language Learning, doi: 10.1080/09588221.2015.1069360
Davis, F. D, Bagozzi, R. P. & Warshaw, P. R., (1989). User acceptance of computer technology: a comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science, 35(8), 982-1003. http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.35.8.982.
[19] Davis, F. D., (1986). A technology acceptance model for empirically testing new end-user information systems: Theory and results (Doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology).
[20] Davis, H. A., (2003). Conceptualizing the role and influence of student- teacher relationships on children's social and cognitive development. Educational Psychologist, 38, 207-234.
[21] Dogruel, L., Joeckel, S., & Bowman, N.D., (2015). the use and acceptance of new media entertainment technology by elderly users: development of an expanded technology acceptance model. Behaviour & Information Technology, doi: 10.1080/0144929X.2015.1077890
[22] Dornyei, Z., (2007). Research methods in applied linguistics. Oxford: university press.
[23] Dudeney, G. & Hockly, N., (2012). ‘ICT in ELT: how did we get here and where are we going? ELT Journal, 66(4), 533-542.
[24] Fullan, M., (1982). The meaning of educational change. New York, OISE. doi: 10.1007/978-94-0114944-012
[25] Ghafari, H. & Molaei, M. A., (2011). Quality and satisfaction of blended-style education in economic courses. World Applied Sciences Journal, 12, (3), 287-289.
[26] Gikas, J. & Grant, M. M., (2013). Mobile computing devices in higher education: Student perspectives on learning with cellphones, smartphones, & social media. Internet and Higher Education, 19, 18-26.
[27] Gunter, G. A.,Gunter, R. E., & Wiens, G. A., (1998). Teaching pre-service teacher's technology: An Innovative approach. Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference.
[28] Hall, G. E., & Loucks, S. F., (1982). Bridging the gap: Policy research rooted in practice. Policy Making in Education, 81, 133-158.
[29] Hampel, R., & Stickler, U., (2005). New skills for new classrooms: Training tutors to teach languages online. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 18(4), 311-326.
[30] Hsu, C., (2014). Learning motivation and adaptive video caption filtering for EFL learners using handheld devices. ReCALL, 27 (1), 84-103. doi: 10.1017/S0958344014000214
[31] Hsu, H.Y., Wang, S.K. & Comac, L., (2008). Using audio blogs to assist English-language learning: an investigation into student perception. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 21(2), 181-198. doi: 10.1080/09588220801943775
[32] Hsu, L., (2012).English as a foreign language learners’ perception of mobile assisted language learning: a cross-national study. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 26:3, 197-213.
[33] Hwang, W. & Chen, H., (2011). Users’ familiar situational contexts facilitate the practice of EFL in elementary schools with mobile devices. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 26(2), 101-125. doi: 10.1080/09588221.2011.639783
[34] Jones, E.P., (2001). Circulation in the Arctic Ocean. Polar Research, 20(2), 139–146.
[35] Kagan, D. M., (1992). Implications of research on teacher belief. Educational Psychologist, 27(1), 65-90.
[36] Katyal, K. R., & Evers, C., (2004). Teacher leadership and autonomous student learning: adjusting to the new realities. International Journal of Educational Research, 41, 367-382.
[37] Kiernan, P., & Aizawa, K., (2004). Cell phones in task based learning are cell phones useful language learning tools? ReCALL, 16, 71-84. doi: 10.1017/S0958344004000618
[38] Kucsera, J. V., Roberts, R., Walls, S., Walker, J., & Svinicki, M., (2011). Goal orientation towards teaching (GOTT) scale. Teachers and Teaching, 17, 597-610. doi: 10.1080/13540602.2011.602212
[39] Kukulska-Hulme, A., & Shield, L., (2008). An overview of mobile assisted language learning: From content delivery to supported collaboration and interaction. ReCALL, 20, 271–289.
[40] Lai, C., (2015). Modeling teachers' influence on learners' self- directed use of technology for language learning outside the classroom. Computers & Education, 82, 74-83.
[41] Lai, C., Yeung, Y., & Hu, J., (2016). University student and teacher perceptions of teacher roles in promoting autonomous language learning with technology outside the classroom. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 29(4), 703-723. doi: 10.1080/09588221.2015.1016441
[42] Lamb, T., (2008). Learner autonomy and teacher autonomy: synthesizing an agenda. In Lamb, T. & Reinders, H. (Eds.), Learner and teacher autonomy: Concepts, realities, and responses (pp. 269-284). Amsterdam, Netherland: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
[43] Larson-Hall, J., & Herrington, R., (2010). Improving data analysis in second language acquisition by utilizing modern developments in applied statistics. Applied Linguistics, 31(3), 368-390.
[44] Ledbetter, A. M. & Finn, A. N., (2016). Why Do Students Use Mobile Technology for Social Purposes during Class? Modeling Teacher Credibility, Learner Empowerment, and Online Communication Attitude as Predictors. Communication Education, 65(1), 1-23. doi: 10.1080/03634523.2015.10641
[45] Lepp, A., Barkley, J. E., & Karpinski, A. C., (2014). The relationship between cellphone use, academic performance, anxiety, and Satisfaction with Life in college students. Computers in Human Behavior, 31, 343-350. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2013.10.049
[46] Li, L., & Walsh, S., (2011). Technology uptake in Chinese EFL classes. Language Teaching Research, 15 (1), 99-125. doi:10.1177/1362168810383347
[47] Mumtaz, S., (2000). Factors affecting teachers’ use of information and communications technology: A review of the literature. Journal of Information Technology for Teacher Education, 9(3), 319–342. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14759390000200096.
[48] Oberg, A. & Daniels, P., (2012).Analysis of the effect a student-centered mobile learning instructional method has on language acquisition. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 26(2), 177-196.
[49] O’Malley, C., Vavoula, G., Glew, J., Taylor, J., Sharples, M., & Lefrere, P., (2003). Guidelines for learning/teaching/tutoring in a mobile environment. Mobilearn Project Deliverable.
[50] Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. T., Glazewski, K. D., Newby, T. J., & Ertmer, P. A. (2010). Teacher value beliefs associated with using technology: addressing professional and student needs. Computers & Education, 55(3), 1321–1335. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.06.002
[51] Paraskeva, F., Bouta, H., & Papagianna, A., (2008). Individual characteristics and computer self efficacy in secondary education teachers to integrate technology in educational practice. Computer and Education, 50(3), 1084-1091.
[52] Park S. Y., Nam, M., & Cha, S., (2012). University students’ behavioral intention to use mobile learning: Evaluating the technology acceptance model. British Journal of Educational Technology, 43(4), 592–605. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8535.2011.01229.x
[53] Plomp, T. & Pelgrum, W. J., (1993). Restructuring of schools as a consequence of computer use? International Journal of Educational Research, 19(2), 185-195. doi:10.1016/0883-0355(93)90027-H
[54] Putnam, R.T. & Borko, H., (2000). What do new views of knowledge and thinking have to say about research on teacher learning? Educational Researcher, 29(1), 4-15.
[55] Reychav, I. & Wu, D., (2015). Mobile collaborative learning: The role of individual learning in groups through text and video content delivery in tablets. Computers in Human Behavior, 50, 520-534.
[56] Sánchez-Prieto, J. C., Olmos-Migueláñez, S., & García-Peñalvo, F.J., (2015). Informal tools in formal contexts: Development of a model to assess the acceptance of mobile technologies among teachers. Computers in Human Behavior, 1-10. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.07.002
[57] Seidman, I., (2006). Interviewing as Qualitative Research: A Guide for Rresearchers in Education and Social Ssciences. Teachers College, Columbia University.
[58] Stockwell, G. (2008). Investigating learner preparedness for and usage patterns of mobile learning. ReCALL,20, 253-270. doi:10.1017/S0958344008000232
[59] Suanpang, P., (2012). The integration of M- learning and social network for knowledge sharing. Scholarly Journals, 3, 39-43.
[60] Teo, T., (2015). Comparing pre service and in service teachers' acceptance of technology: Assessment of measurement invariance and latent mean differences. Computers & Education, 83, 22–31. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2014.11.015
[61] Teo, T. C., Lee, B., & Chai, C.S., (2007). Understanding pre-service teachers’ computer attitudes: applying and extending the technology acceptance model. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning,24, 128-143. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2729.2007.00247.x
[62] Toffoli, D. & Sockett, G., (2015). University teachers’ perceptions of online informal learning of english (OILE). Computer Assisted Language Learning, 28(1), 7-21. doi: 10.1080/09588221.2013.776970.
[63] Usta, E., Korkmaz, Ö., (2010). Pre-service teachers’ computer competencies, perception of technology use and attitudes toward teaching career. International Journal of Human Sciences, 7(1), 1335-1349.
[64] Venkatesh, V., (2000). Determinants of perceived ease of use: Integrating control, intrinsic motivation, and emotion into the technology acceptance model. Information Systems Research, 11(4), 342–365.
[65] Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D., (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425–478.
[66] Walsh, S., (2013). Classroom Discourse and Teacher Development. Edinburgh University Press Ltd.
[67] Wang, M., Shen, R., Novak, D., & Pan, X., (2009). The impact of mobile learning on students’ learning behaviors and performance: Report from a large blended classroom. British Journal of Educational Technology, 40(4), 673-695.
[68] White, J., & Mills, D., (2014). Examining attitudes towards and usage of smartphone technology among Japanese university students studying EFL. CALL-EJ, 15(2), 1–15.
[69] Winters, N., (2006). What is mobile learning? In: Sharples, M. (ed.), Big Issues in Mobile Learning. Report of a workshop by the Kaleidoscope Network of Excellence Mobile Learning Initiative. Nottingham: University of Nottingham.
[70] Wray, L. D., & Stone, E. R., (2005). The role of self‐esteem and anxiety in decision making for self versus others in relationships. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 18(2), 125-144.
[71] Yunus, M. M., (2007). Malaysian ESL teachers' use of ICT in their classrooms: Expectations and realities. ReCALL, 19(1), 79-95. doi:10.1017/S0958344007000614
[72] Zhao, Y. & Cziko, G. A., (2001). Teacher adoption of technology: A perceptual control theory perspective. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 9(1), 5-30.
The International Journal of Humanities
