The Uncanny Gender: Gender and the Unrepresentability of Subject Formation in Margaret Atwood's Surfacing and Bodily Harm

Document Type : Original Research

Authors
Roya Elahi 1
AmirAli Nojoumian 2
1 Ph.D. Candidate in English Language and Literature, Islamic Azad University, ‎Tehran, Central Branch, Tehran, Iran
2 Associate Professor, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran
Abstract
This article is an attempt to study subject formation in relation to gender in Margaret Atwood's (1939- ) Surfacing (1979) and Bodily Harm (1983) within the frame of the uncanny. The issue of gender has been discussed in Atwood's novels from different perspectives but this article claims that what have been rarely discussed in Atwood's novels are the unrepresentable realities in relation to gender which can be foregrounded by dislodging the uncanny. The uncanny which was once a rather minor issue in Freudian oeuvre has been reconsidered in the contemporary era by prominent thinkers, such as Jean-François Lyotard and Julia Kristeva whose ideas are used in elaborating the unrepresentability of gender in this article. The idea of the female sublime is the most significant issue in the context of the uncanny in this article which challenges any representational system of gender formation and problematizes our preconceived hence familiar perceptions of gender formation and reevaluates them in an unfamiliar, dynamic and unrepresentable space.

Keywords

Subjects

Atwood, Margaret. (1983). Bodily Harm. London: Virago.
----- (1979). Surfacing. London: Virago, 1979.
Bakhtin, Mikhail. (1968). Rabelais and His World. Trans. Helen Iswolsky. Bloomington: Indiana Univ. Press.
Benjamin, Andrew. (Ed). (1989). The Lyotard Reader. Oxford: Basil Blackwell
Bloom, Harold. (Ed). (2010). The Sublime. New York: Bloom's literary Criticism.
Collins, Jo and Jervis, John, eds. (2008). Uncanny Modernity: Cultural Theories and Modern Anxieties: New York: Palgrave.
Freud, Sigmund and James Strachey. (1976). The Complete Psychological Work of Sigmund Freud. Vol. 1-24 W.W. Norton &Company.
Jentsch, Ernst. (2008). "On the Psychology of the Uncanny" in Jo Collons and John Jervis.Eds.Uncanny Modernity: Cultural Theories and Modern Anxieties. New York: Palgrave.
Howells, Coral Ann. ( Ed). (2006). The Cambridge Companion to Margaret Atwood. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Huddart, David. (2006). Homi K. Bhabha. New York: Routledge.
Kristeva, Julia. (1982). Powers of Horror: An Essay on Abjection. Trans. Leon S. Roudiez. New York: Columbia UP.
Royle, Nicholas. (2003). The Uncanny. Manchester: Manchester University press.
Russo, Mary. (1994). The Female Grotesque: Risk, Excess and Modernity. New York and London: Routledge.
Sawyer, Dylan. (2014). Lyotard, Literature and the Trauma of the Differend. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Shapira, Yael. (January 2010). "Hairball Speaks: Margaret Atwood and the Narrative Legacy of the Female Grotesque", Narrative, Number 1, Volume 18, pp. 51-72.
Wawrzinek, Jennifer. (2008). Ambiguous Subjects: Discussion and Metamorphosis in the Postmodern Sublime. Amsterdam - New York: Rodopi.
Whiteman, Anne. (2004). Trauma Fiction. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
The International Journal of Humanities
Volume 25, Issue 3
June 2018
Pages 33-48