The Hierarchical Rationality of Religious Beliefs System in Islamic and Christian Traditions

Document Type : Original Research

Author
Qodratullah Qorbani
Associate Professor
Abstract
The rationality of religious belief systems indicates longitudinal relationships, so that each benefit from pertained rationality based on ontological place within the web of religious knowledge. Therefore, it can be possible to consider three layers of religious beliefs i.e. fundamental, middle, and marginal. Here fundamental beliefs are the most rational, followed by middle and finally marginal. Concerning Islamic and Christian traditions, there can be two beliefs, believing in one God and the hereafter, that are considered fundamental ones. There are also middle beliefs between the two mainstream religions that are about divine attributes, the relationship between God and human beings, and so on so forth. Finally, the level of marginal beliefs of two are about the sacredness of places, times, events, things, persons, situations etc. This research wants to show that although all religious beliefs have been expanded and changed under the influence of epistemic and non-epistemic factors, t fundamental beliefs have been more stable, immutable, universal, and compatible. Middle beliefs of Islam and Christianity, are generally based on believers’ plural understandings of religious texts and under aforementioned factors. Thus, in order to study the rationality of religions and their traditions, it is necessary to pay closer attention to how and under what conditions (epistemic and non-epistemic) their web of beliefs are formed and shaped.

Keywords

Subjects

- The Quran.
- The Bible.
- Ahmadi, Muhammad Amin (2005), Human Expectations of Religion, Qom, Institute for Islamic Sciences & Culture.
- Brown, Harold (1988), Rationality, London, Routledge.
- Davis, Stephon, T. (2006), Christian Philosophical Theology, Oxford, Oxford University Press.
- Fanaei, Abulqasem (2005), the Ethics of Theology, Tehran, Negahe Moaser Press.
- Javadi Amoli, Abdollah (2008), A, the Place of Reason in the Light of Religious Knowledge Framework, Qom, Isra Press.
- Javadi Amoli, Abdollah (2008), B, Religious Studies, Qom, Isra Press.
- McGrath, Alister (2017), Christian Theology; an Introduction, Wiley Blackwell Press.
- Muhajirani, Abbas (1996), Twelve Imam, Shi’ite Theological and Philosophical Thought, in: History of Islamic Philosophy, London, Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.
- Nickerson, Raymond, S (2008), What Is Rationality? In Aspects of Rationality, New York, Taylor & Francis Group Press.
- Pavlin, James (1996), Sunni Kalam and theological controversies, in: History of Islamic Philosophy, London, Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.
- Peterson, Michael & Others (2017), Reason and Religious Belief, Oxford, Oxford University Press.
- Quine, Willard Van Orman (2002), the Web of Belief, Trans by Amir Divani, Soroush & Taha Press.
- Ratzinger, Joseph C. (2000), Catechism of the Catholic Church, United States Catholic Conference Inc.
- Stenmark, Mikael (1995), Rationality in Science, Religion, and Everyday Life: A Critical Evaluation of Four Models of Rationality, University of Norte Dame, Indiana, USA.
- Tabatabaei, Seyyed Muhammad Hussein (1975), Shi’ite Islam, Trans by Seyyed Hossein Nasr, State University of New York Press.
- Vaezi, Ahmad (2004), Shia Political Thought, Islamic Center of England.
- Lehrer, Keith (1990), Theory of Knowledge, USA, University of Arizona.
- Lehrer, Bonjour; Ernest Sosa (2003), Epistemic Justification: Internalism vs Externalism, Foundations vs. Virtues, Oxford, Blackwell.
The International Journal of Humanities
Volume 30, Issue 2
Winter 2023
Pages 16-41