Mīr Dāmād on Essence, Existence and Priority

Document Type : Original Research

Author
Associate professor Philosophy department Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran
Abstract
Mīr Dāmād, as a philosopher in Islamic and Peripatetic tradition, scrutinizes the issue of essence and existence. His main ideas are as follows: first, existence is not a real attribute; second, existence is nothing but to be existent; and third, essence is prior to existence. In this paper, I explain how these ideas can be interpreted within the context of the history of Islamic philosophy. I shall interpret Mīr Dāmād's views on essence, existence and priority against most eminent figures in the tradition such as Suhrawardī and Avicenna among others. As I will argue, Mīr Dāmād proposes an innovative view within the Peripatetic tradition, though he is following (his own interpretation of) Avicenna's philosophy of existence.

Keywords

Subjects


1. Āmulī, ‘Abdullāh Javādī. (1375H). Raḥīq Makhtūm, Qum: Isrā.
2. Averroes. (1377H). Talkhīs Mā Ba‘d al-Ṭabī‘ah, Edited by ‘Uthmān Amīn, Tehran: Hekmat.
3. Fayyāḍī, Ghulām Reza. (1388H). Existence and Essence in Sadrāean Tradition, Qum: RIHU.
4. Khayyām, ‘Umar. (1380H). al-Ḍīyā’u al-‘Aqlī fī Mawḍū‘i al-‘Ilm al-Kullī, Edited by Ghulām Reza Jamshīd Nezhad Avval, Farhang 39&40, 119-139.
5. Menn, Stephen. (2012). “Fārābī in the Reception of Avicenna’s Metaphysics: Averroes against Avicenna on Being and Unity,” In The Arabic, Hebrew and Latin Reception of Avicenna’s Metaphysics, ed. A. Bertolacci and D. Hasse. Berlin: De Gruyter, 51-96.
6. ----------. (2013). “Avicenna's Metaphysics,” In Interpreting Avicenna, Critical Essays, Edited by Peter Adamson, 143-169.
7. Mīr Dāmād, Muhammad Bāqir. (1367H). al-Qabasāt, Edited by Mahī Muḥaqqiq, Tehan: TUP.
8. ----------. (1381H). Collected Works of Mīr Dāmād, Volume 1, Edited by ‘Abdullāh Nūrānī, Tehran: SACWD.
9. ----------. (1391H). al-’Ufuq al-Mubīn, Edited by Hāmid Nājī Iṣfahānī, Tehran: Mīrāth Maktūb.
10. Rāzī, Fakhr al-dīn. (1384H). Sharḥ al-Ishārāt wa al-Tanbīhāt, Edited by Ali Reza Najafzādeh Turbatī, Tehran: SACWD.
11. Strobino, Riccardo. (2015). “What If That (Is) Why? Avicenna’s Taxonomy of Scientific Inquiries,” In Aristotle and the Arabic Tradition, Edited by Ahmed Alwishah, Josh Hayes, Cambridge, 50-75.
12. Suhrawardī, Shīhāb al-Dīn. (1375H). Collected Works of Shaykh al-Ishrāq, Edited by Henry Corbin, Tehran: ICSR.
13. Ṭabāṭabā’ī, Sayyed Muḥammd Hossein. (1393H). Nihāyat al-Ḥikmah, Edited and commented by ‘Abbās Ali Sabziwārī, Qum: Mu’assisah al-Nashr al-Islamī.
14. ‘Ubūdīyat, ‘Abd al-Rasūl. (1385H). Daramadi be Nezame Hekmate Sadraee (An Introduction to Mūllā Sadrā’s Theosophical System), Volume 1, Tehran: Samt.
15. Wisnovsky, Robert. (2003). Avicenna’s Metaphysics in Context, Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Press.
16. ----------. (2004). “One Aspect of the Avicennian Turn in Sunni Theology,” Arabic Sciences and Philosophy 14/1, pp. 65 – 100.
17. ----------. (2005). “Avicenna and the Avicennian Tradition,” In P. Adamson and R. Taylor, eds., The Cambridge Companion to Arabic Philosophy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 92– 136.
18. ----------. (2012). “Essence and Existence in the Islamic East (Mashriq) in the 11th and 12th centuries CE: A sketch.” In The Arabic, Hebrew and Latin Reception of Avicenna’s Metaphysics, ed. A. Bertolacci and D. Hasse. Berlin: De Gruyter, 27–50.
19. ----------. (2013). “Avicennism and Exegetical Practice in the Early Commentaries on the Ishārāt,” Oriens 41, 349-378.