A Time Perspective of Motivational Fluctuation over Task Performance of Persian Language Learners (Intermediate Level)

Document Type : Original Research

Authors
Hadi Yaghoubinejad 1
Zahra Abbasi 2
1 Assistant Professor, Department of Foreign Languages, Kosar University of Bojnord, Bojnord, Iran
2 Assistant Professor, Department of Linguistics and Foreign Languages, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran
Abstract
Motivation for learning a new language does not have an all-or-none impact. It is gradually ‎formed and fluctuated over time and on each timescale has varying levels of influence on a ‎person’s endeavor to learn a language. At the present time, scholars claim that throughout the ‎Second Language Development (SLD) different timescales interact with each other and this ‎interaction is nonlinear, complex and dynamic in nature (de Bot 2015). The present study ‎attempted to investigate the motivational dynamics of a group of Persian learners in longer ‎timescales composed of a number of tasks performed on shorter timescales. Ten participants were ‎interviewed at the onset, while performing tasks and at the end of the course to better picture the ‎interplay of different motivational themes over time. The findings confirmed temporal variation ‎in participants’ motivation. Although some individual specific variation was observed, the ‎average group motivation was increasingly tending toward an overall stable state. Moreover, the ‎data revealed the fact that motivational themes were not equally effective over the course and ‎during task performance. It was shown, for example, that factors influencing learners’ initial ‎motivation were less influential during the task completion. Finally, L2 motivation was found to ‎contain an interrelationship of a number of dynamic and complex factors which varied over ‎different timescales and had different motivational intensity in each specific stage. Finally, some ‎implications were driven from the findings of the study.‎

Keywords

Subjects

[1] Ahmadian, M., M. Tavakoli and H. Vahid Dastjerdi (2015). The combined effects of online planning and task structure on complexity, accuracy and fluency of L2 speech. The Language Learning Journal 43, no. 1: 41-56. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09571736.2012.681795
[2] Azarnoosh, M., (2014). “School Students’ Motivational Disposition: A Cross-Sectional Study”. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences 98: 324-333. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.423
[3] Busse, V., and C. Walter (2013). “Foreign Language Learning Motivation in Higher Education: A Longitudinal Study of Motivational Changes and their Causes.” The Modern Language Journal97 (2): 435-456. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2013.12004.x
[4] Campbell, E., and N. Storch (2011). “The Challenging Face of Motivation: A Study of Second Language Learners’ Motivation over Time.” Australian Review of Applied Linguistics 34 (2): 166-192. http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/aral.34.2.03cam
[5] de Bot, K., (2012). “Time Scales in Second Language Development.” Dutch Journal of Applied Linguistics 1 (1): 143-149. http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/dujal.1.1.10deb
[6] de Bot, K., (2015). “Rates of Change: Timescales in Second Language Development.” In Motivational Dynamics in Language Learning, edited byZ. Dörnyei, Henry, A. andMacIntyre, P. D., 29-37. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
[7] Denzin, K. N., and Y. S. Lincoln (2005). The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research. Sage.
[8] Dörnyei, Z., (2002). “The Motivational Basis of Language Learning Tasks.” Chap. 7 in Individual Differences and Instructed Language Learning. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/lllt.2.10dor
[9] Dörnyei, Z., (2009). “The L2 Motivational Self System.” In Motivation, Language Identity and the L2 Self, edited by Z. DörnyeiandUshioda,E., 9-42. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
[10] Dörnyei, Z., (2014). “Researching Complex Dynamic Systems: Retrodictive Qualitative Modelling in the Language Classroom.” Language Teaching 47(1): 80-91. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0261444811000516
[11] Dörnyei, Z., and L. Chan (2013). “Motivation and Vision: An Analysis of Future L2 Self Images, Sensory Styles, and Imagery Capacity across Two Target Languages.” Language Learning 63(3): 437-462. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/lang.12005
[12] Dörnyei, Z., A. Henry, and P. D. MacIntyre (2015). Motivational Dynamics in Language Learning. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
[13] Dörnyei, Z., and I. Ottó, (1998). “Motivation in Action: A Process Model of L2 Motivation.” Working Papers in Applied Linguistics 4: 43-69.
[14] Ellis, R., (2000). “Task-Based Research and Language Pedagogy.” Language Teaching Research 4(3): 193-220.http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/136216880000400302
[15] Gardner, R. C., and W. E. Lambert, (1959). “Motivational Variables in Second Language Acquisition.” Canadian Journal of Psychology, no.13: 266-272. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0083787
[16] Kiany, G. R., Mahdavy, B., and Ghafar Samar, R., (2012). “Motivational Changes of Learners in a Traditional Context of English Education: A Case Study of High School Students in Iran”. International Journal of Research Studies in Language Learning 2(1): 3-16.
[17] Kormos, J., and Z. Dörnyei, (2004). “The Interaction of Linguistic and Motivational Variables in Second Language Task Performance.” ZeitschriftFürInterkulturellenFremdsprachenunterricht9 (2): 1-19.
[18] Larsen-Freeman, D., (2015). “Ten Lessons from Complex Dynamic Systems Theory: What is on Offer.” In Motivational Dynamics in Language Learning, edited byZ. Dörnyei, Henry, A. andMacIntyre, P. D.,11-19. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
[19] Larsen-Freeman, D., and L. Cameron (2008). Complex Systems and Applied Linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
[20] MacIntyre, P. D., and A. Serroul (2015). “Motivation on a Per-Second Timescale: Examining Approach-Avoidance Motivation during L2 Task Performance.” In Motivational Dynamics in Language Learning, edited byZ. Dörnyei, Henry, A. andMacIntyre, P. D., 109-138. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
[21] Mercer, S., (2011). “Language Learner Self-Concept: Complexity, Continuity and Change.” System 39(3): 335-346.http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2011.07.006
[22] Miles, M. B., and A. H. Huberman (1994). Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook. Sage.
[23] Papi, M., and Teimouri, Y., (2014). “Language Learner Motivational Types: A Cluster Analysis Study”. Language Learning 64(3): 493-525. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/lang.12065
[24] Poupore, G., (2013). “Task Motivation in Process: A Complex Systems Perspective.” Canadian Modern Language Review/La Revue canadienne des languesvivantes69(1): 91-116. http://dx.doi.org/10.3138/cmlr.1139
[25] Ritchie, J., and L. Spencer, (2002). “Qualitative Data Analysis for Applied Policy Research.” In The Qualitative Researcher’s Companion, edited by A.M. Huberman, and Miles, M. B., 305-329. London: Sage.
[26] Sedighi far, Z., and Khaleghizadeh, S., (2016). “Motivational Orientation and academic achievement in non-Iranian Arabic-speaking learners of Persian”. Journal of Teaching Persian to Speakers of Other Languages 5 (12): 75-94.
[27] Shoaib, A. M., and Z. Dörnyei, (2005). “Affect in Life-Long Learning: Exploring L2 Motivation as a Dynamic Process.” In Learners’ Stories: Differenceand Diversity in Language Learning ,edited by P. Benson and Nunan, D., 22-41. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
[28] Taguchi, T., Magid, M., and Papi, M., (2009). “The L2 Motivational Self System among Japanese, Chinese and Iranian Learners of English: A Comparative Case Study”. In Motivation, Language Identity and the L2 Self, edited byZ. Dörnyeiand Ushioda E., 66-97. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
[29] ten Dam, G., and S. Blom, (2006). “Learning through Participation: The Potential of School-Based Teacher Education for Developing a Professional Identity.” Teaching and Teacher Education 22(6): 647-660.http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2006.03.003
[30] Thompson, A. S., and J. Lee., (2016). “The Motivational Factors Questionnaire in the Korean EFL Context: Predicting Group Membership According to English Proficiency and Multilingual Status. The Language Learning Journal: 1-23. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09571736.2015.1130082
[31] Waninge, F., Z. Dörnyei, and K. de Bot., (2014). “Motivational Dynamics in Language Learning: Change, Stability, and Context.” The Modern Language Journal 98(3): 704-723.http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/modl.12118
[32] Yaghoubinejad, H., N. Zarrinabadi, and S. Ketabi. 2016. “Fluctuations in Foreign Language Motivation: An Investigation into Iranian Learners’ Motivational Change over Time.” Current Psychology : 1-10. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12144-016-9467-6
[33] Yanguas, I., (2011). “The Dynamic Nature of Motivation during the Task: Can it be Captured?” Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching 5(1): 35-61. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17501229.2010.519771
The International Journal of Humanities
Volume 26, Issue 3
Summer 2019
Pages 85-105