How Bodies Reveal Inequality? Some Experiences of Theater of the Oppressed in Iran

Document Type : Original Research

Author
Researcher, Department of Historical studies, University of Gothenburg, Sweden
Abstract
“You are able to consume everything but your bodies…”. This stereotypic phrase is a very repetitive one, endorsed in most of the workshops on “body and archaeology”. The workshops, I am holding for three years is various cities of Iran are actually based on Augusto Boal’s Theater of the Oppressed and the very concept of Docile Bodies of Michael Foucault. My very goal in these series of workshops is to clarify the process of oppression for students of anthropology and social sciences using a method more than describing the theoretical dilemma. Over the last couple of years, it has been more clarified to me that over half of the youths attending the workshops have no motivation to move or present their body and voice abilities. They prefer to remain the silent audiences of an instructor’s monologue. The rate of such a desire increases in larger cities representing the increasing rate of body control. To manage Boal’s plays, I usually conduct the machine play to warm up minds but surprisingly, more I practice, more these are female participants who share their experiences of body oppression while male students remain silent. Is there any recognized pattern which shapes their exception of presenting the bodies? Are they fearful of losing their social agency towards playing new Avant-garde roles? I believe that the answer is positive. There are patterns of docile bodies which are objectively observable in the process of playing Theater of the Oppressed in Iran and mostly these patterns are gender-based. In this article, I intend to describe the body patterns derived from the workshops on Body and Archaeology in order to a better understanding of docile bodies based on acts and practices.

Keywords

Subjects


[1] Ansari, Ali (ed.) (2013). Perceptions of Iran: History, Myths and Nationalism from Medieval Persia to the Islamic. I. B. Taruis
[2] Berlin, Isaiah (2004). The Soviet Mind: Russian Culture under Communism. Henry Hardy (Editor). Brookings Institution Press
[3] Berlin, Isiah (1972). “The problem of nationalism: A dialogue with Stuart Hampshire”, chaired by Bryan Magee ITV, http://berlin.wolf.ox.ac.uk/lists/nachlass/probnati.pdf
[4] Boal, Augusto (2013). The Rainbow of Desire: The Boal Method of Theatre and Therapy.
Routledge
[5] Boal, Augusto (2002).Games for Actors and Non-actors. Translated by Adrian Jackson. Routledge
[6] Boal, Augusto (2000). Theater of the Oppressed. Pluto press
[7] Bordo, Susan (1991). Docile Bodies, rebellious bodies: Facauldian perspectives on female pscycoanthology. In Hugh J. Silverman (ed.) Writing the Politics of Difference. Sunny Press: 203-217
[8] Butler, Judith (2015). Notes Toward a Performative Theory of Assembly. Harvard University Press
[9] Butler, Judith (2011). Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. Routledge
[10] Ellul, Jacques (2006). “The characteristics of propaganda”. in Garth S. Jowett, Victoria O'Donnell (eds.) Readings in Propaganda and Persuasion: New and Classic Essays. SAGE:1-15.
[11] Foucault, Michel (2012). Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. Knopf Doubleday Publishing Group
[12] Freire , Paulo (1993). Pedagogy of the Oppressed. Continuum
[13] González‐Ruibal, Alfredo (2014). Contemporary Past, Archaeology of the…. In Claire Smith (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Global Archaeology, Springer: 1683-1694.
[14] Kachouian, Hassan (2000). Paleontology of Knowledge, a Narration of Humanities from Renaissance to post-Modernity. Tehran University Publication. (in Persian)
[15] Kamalipour ,Yahya and Nancy Snow (ed.) (2004). War, Media, and Propaganda: A Global Perspective. Rowman & Littlefield.
[16] Kazemi, Abbas (2018). University, From Ladder to Canopy. Institute for social and cultural studies (in Persian)
[17] Malick, Javed (1995). Toward a Theater of the Oppressed: The Dramaturgy of John Arden. University of Michigan Press.
[18] McLaren, Margaret A., (2002). Feminism, Foucault, and Embodied Subjectivity.
Sunny Press.
[19] Morelos, Ronaldo (1999). Symbols and Power in the Theatre of the Oppressed.
[20] Paidar, Parvin (1997). Women and the Political Process in Twentieth-Century Iran.
Cambridge University Press.
[21] Papoli-Yazdi, Leila , Maryam Deyhamkhooy , Omran Garazhian, Hassan Mousavi and Gohar Soleimani (2017). The Politics of Gender at the end of Qajar Period and during Pahlavi I Era. Negah Moaser (in Persian)
[22] Papoli-Yazdi, Leila and Omran Garazhian (2012). Archaeology as an Imported Commodity. A Critical Approach to the Position of Archaeology in Iran (Archäologie als Importware. Ein kritischer Blick auf die Stellung der Archäologie in Iran). Forum Kritische Archäologie 1: 24-34.
[23] Sedghi , Hamideh (2007). Women and Politics in Iran: Veiling, Unveiling, and Revealing. Cambridge University Press.
[24] Sheets-Johnstone, Maxine (1994). The Roots of Power: Animate Form and Gendered Bodies. Open Court Publishing,
[25] Vallega-Neu, Daniela (2012). The Bodily Dimension in Thinking. Sunny
[26] Yang, Xiao-ming (1994). The Rhetoric of Propaganda: A Tagmemic Analysis of Selected Documents of the Cultural Revolution of China. Peter Lang.
[27] Zhou, Zhiwu (2017). The Theory and Practice of Dialogue Teaching in University Political Course. Open Journal of Social Sciences (5): 190-193.