“To Live Even One Day”: A Comparative Narratological Study of the Representation of Characters’ Discourses in Virginia Woolf’s Mrs Dalloway and Marleen Gorris’s Cinematic Adaptation

Document Type : Original Research

Authors
Mohammad Ghaffary 1
Mahsa Hashemi 2
1 Department of English Language and Literature, Faculty of Letters and Languages, Arak University, Arak, Iran
2 Assistant Professor, Department of English Language and Literature, Persian Gulf University, Bushehr, Iran
10.48311/eijh.31.3.4
Abstract
Modernist literature decidedly experiments with such modes of discourse representation as free indirect discourse (FID) to highlight the subjective nature of reality and reflect the estrangement of the modern subject. Accordingly, an analysis of discourse representation has proved to be integral in exploring Modernist narratives. The discourse representation in movies, however, has received little attention from film narratologists. After an overview of discourse representation in literature and film, the present paper examines Virginia Woolf’s modernist masterpiece Mrs Dalloway (1925) and its cinematic adaptation of the same title by Marleen Gorris (1997) and its interconnectedness to present characters’ subjectivities. The basic claim of this study is that the (free) indirect discourses of the novel are turned into free direct discourse in the movie using the technique of internal sound or flashback. Although there are instances of internal focalisation in this movie, they are so disjointed or short that the dominant discourse remains that of the narrator. Therefore, the findings of the present essay demonstrate that Gorris’ film is not creative enough to bring about effects equal to or beyond those produced by Woolf’s or reproduce the underlying forces of “difference” at play in Woolf’s text.

Keywords

Subjects

[1] Andrew, D. (1980). “The Well-Worn Muse: Adaptation in Film and Theory.” In Narrative Strategies: Original Essays in Film and Prose Fiction (pp. 9-17). Ed. S. Conger and J. R. Welsh. Macomb: Western Illinois UP.
[2] Balfour, I. (2016). “Free Indirect Filmmaking: Jane Austen and the Renditions (On Emma among Its Others).” In Constellations of a Contemporary Romanticism (pp. 248-266). Ed. J. Khalip and F. Pyle. Fordham University Press.
[3] Banfield, A. (1973). “Narrative Style and the Grammar of Direct and Indirect Speech.” Foundations of Language 10 (1), pp. 1-39.
[4] Benjamin, W. (2006). The Writer of Modern Life: Essays on Charles Baudelaire. Ed. M. W. Jennings. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
[5] Brooks, P. (1992). Reading for the Plot: Design and Intention in Narrative. Harvard University Press.
[6] Cartmell, D. (2012). “100+ Years of Adaptations, or, Adaptation as the Art Form of Democracy.” In A Companion to Literature, Film and Adaptation (pp. 1-14). Ed. D. Cartmell. Wiley-Blackwell Publications.
[7] Chatman, S. (1980). Story and Discourse: Narrative Structure in Fiction and Film. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
[8] Deleyto, C. (1996). “Focalisation in Film Narrative.” In Narratology: An Introduction (pp. 217-233). Ed. S. Onega and J. A. G. Landa. London: Longman.
[9] DiBattista, M. (2009). Imagining Virginia Woolf: An Experiment in Critical Biography. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
[10] Dick, B. F. (2005). Anatomy of Film. 5th Edition. Boston: Bedford / St. Martin’s.
[11] Dry, H. A. (2002). “Free Indirect Discourse in Doris Lessing’s ‘One Off the Short List’: A Case of Designed Ambiguity.” In Twentieth-Century Fiction: From Text to Context (pp. 96-112). Ed. P. Verdonk and J. J. Weber. London: Routledge.
[12] Edmondson, A. (2012). “Narrativizing Characters in Mrs. Dalloway.” Journal of Modern Literature 36 (1), pp. 17-36.
[13] Fabri, P. (1994). “Free / Indirect / Discourse.” In Pier Paolo Pasolini: Contemporary Perspectives (pp. 78-87). Ed. P. Rumble and B. Testa. University of Toronto Press.
[14] Foucault, M. (1984). The Foucault Reader. Ed. P. Rabinow. New York: Pantheon.
[15] Gabri, R. (2015). “Recognizing the Unrecognizable in Darius Mehrjui’s Gav.” Cinema Journal 54 (2), pp. 49-71.
[16] Gaudreault, A., & F. Jost. (2004). “Enunciation and Narration.” In A Companion to Film Theory (pp. 45-63). Ed. T. Miller and R. Stam. Blackwell Publishing.
[17] Ghaffary, M., & A. A. Nojoumian. (2013a). “A Poetics of Free Indirect Discourse in Narrative Film.” Rupkatha Journal on Interdisciplinary Studies in Humanities 5 (2), pp. 269-81.
[18] Ghaffary, M., & A. A. Nojoumian. (2013b). “Free Indirect Discourse and Its Significance in Narrative Stylistics: A Comparative Study of Modernist and Pre-Modernist Fiction.” Critical Language and Literary Studies 5 (8), pp. 85-117. [In Persian]
[19] Gorris, M. (director). (1997). Mrs Dalloway. Bayly / Paré and Bergen Film.
[20] Grodal, T. (2005). “Thought and Consciousness Representation (Film).” In The Routledge Encyclopedia of Narrative Theory (pp. 601-602). Ed. D. Herman, M. Jahn, and M.-L. Ryan. London: Routledge.
[21] Habermas, J. (1981). “Modernity versus Postmodernity.” New German Critique 22, pp. 3-14.
[22] Heinemann, D. (2012). “The Creative Voice: Free Indirect Speech in the Cinema of Rohmer and Bresson.” The New Soundtrack 2 (1), pp. 39-49.
[23] Hutcheon, L. (with S. O’Flynn). (2013). A Theory of Adaptation. 2nd edition. Routledge.
[24] Jahn, M. (2007). “Focalisation.” In The Cambridge Companion to Narrative (pp. 94-108). Ed. D. Herman. New York: Cambridge University Press.
[25] Jahn, M. (2021a). A Guide to Narratological Film Analysis 2.0. English Department, University of Cologne. 29 Dec. 2021. <http://www.uni-koeln.de/~ame02/pppf.pdf>
[26] Jahn, M. (2021b). Narratology 2.3: A Guide to the Theory of Narrative. English Department, University of Cologne. <www.uni-koeln.de/~ame02/pppn.pdf.>
[27] Jones, G. G. (1997). “Free Indirect Style in Mrs. Dalloway.” Postscript (14), pp. 69-80.
[28] Klein, M. & G. Parker. (1981). “Introduction.” In The English Novel and the Movies (pp. 1-13). Ed. M. Klein and G. Parker. New York: Fredrick Ungar.
[29] McHale, B. (2004). “Free Indirect Discourse: A Survey of Recent Accounts.” In Narrative Theory: Critical Concepts in Literary and Cultural Studies (pp. 187-222). Ed. M. Bal. London: Routledge.
[30] Miller, T. (2004). “Introduction.” In A Companion to Film Theory (pp. 1-8). Ed. T. Miller and R. Stam. Blackwell Publishing.
[31] Morrissette, B. (1985). Novel and Film: Essays in Two Genres. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
[32] Pascal, R. (1977). The Dual Voice: Free Indirect Speech and Its Functioning in the Nineteenth-Century European Novel. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
[33] Pasolini, P. P. (1988). “The Cinema of Poetry.” In Heretical Empiricism (pp. 167-186). Trans. B. Lawton and L. K. Barnet. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
[34] Pound, E. (1935). Make It New. Yale University Press.
[35] Schwartz, L. G. (2005). “Typewriter: Free Indirect Discourse in Deleuze’s Cinema.” SubStance 34 (3), pp. 107-135.
[36] Simpson, P., & M. Montgomery. (2002). “Language, Literature, and Film: The Stylistics of Bernard Maclaverty’s ‘Cal’.” In Twentieth-Century Fiction: From Text to Context (pp. 138-164). Ed. P. Verdonk and J. J. Weber. London: Routledge.
[37] Stam, R. (2000). Film Theory: An Introduction. New York: Blackwell Publishers.
[38] Toolan, M. J. (2001). Narrative: A Critical-Linguistic Introduction. 2nd edition. London: Routledge.
[39] Wagner, G. (1975). The Novel and the Cinema. Rutherford, NJ: Fairleigh Dickinson University Press.
[40] Woolf, V. (1925). The Common Reader. New York: Harcourt, Brace and Company.
[41] Woolf, V. (1984). “Modern Fiction.” In The Essays of Virginia Woolf. Volume 4: 1925 to 1928 (pp. 157-165). Ed. A. McNeille. London: The Hogarth Press.
[42] Woolf, V. (2003). Mrs Dalloway. Hertfordshire: Wordsworth.
The International Journal of Humanities
Volume 31, Issue 3
Summer 2024
Pages 49-67