Exploring Persian as a Second Language Teachers’ Acceptance of Web-based E-Learning Technology: An Extended Technology Acceptance Model

Document Type : Original Research

Author
Rezvan Motavallian
AssociateProfessor of Linguistics, University of Isfahan
Abstract
Since the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020 up to at least the beginning of 2022, e-learning has largely replaced the face-to-face teaching method in Iran. Accepting web-based learning could be effective in the continuity of this method, at least in a hybrid one, even in normal circumstances. As such, the role of teachers’ perspectives in this regard should not be neglected. Due to the importance of this kind of technology in teaching a second language and the effect of teacher acceptance on the decision to use it, in this study, we examine 63 Persian as a Second language (PSL) teachers' acceptance of Web-based e-learning technology to explore the various factors that impact their intentions to use it. This study uses the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) as the theoretical foundation. The survey data obtained from 63 PSL teachers through previously tested and validated questionnaires are analyzed using Structural Equation Modeling with AMOS. The results suggest that the perceived usefulness (PU) directly impacts behavioral intention (BI). Then, there is the motivation to use (MU) construct and the perceived ease of use (PEU), which could indirectly affect BI. The Internet self-efficacy (ISE) construct directly affects BI. Finally, the factor of computer anxiety has a negative effect on behavioral intentions to use web-based E-learning technologies through the factor of perceived ease of use. The research results show that perceived usefulness is the most influential factor in PSL teachers’ intention to use technology. It implies that PSL teachers would be more likely to continue to use Web-based E-learning technologies if they consider them useful.

Keywords

Subjects

Abbad, M.M. , Morris, D. , Al-Ayyoub, A. and Abbad, J.M. (2009). Students' decisions to use an e-learning system: a structural equation modelling analysis. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, volume 4 (4): 4-13.
Aithal, P. S. & Shubhrajyotsna, A. (2016). Impact of On-Line Education on Higher Education System. International Journal of Engineering Research and Modern Education (IJERME), 1(1), 225-235.
Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Almosa, A. (2002). Use of computer in education, (2nd ed). Riyadh: Future Education Library.
Alshurafat, H., Al Shbail, M.O., Masadeh, W.M., Dahmash, F., Al‑Msiedeen, J. M. (2021). Factors affecting online accounting education during the COVID-19 pandemic: an integrated perspective of social capital theory, the theory of reasoned action and the technology acceptance model. Education and Information Technologies . https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10550-y
Anderson, T. (2008). The Theory and Practice of Online Learning. Second Edition. AU Press Canada. Athbasca University.
Chen, H. I. (2004). A study of e-learning training system for Kaohsiung Rapid Transit Corporation. Master Thesis, National Sun Yat-sen University, Taiwan.
Chen, H. R., & Huang, H. L. (2010). User acceptance of mobile knowledge management learning system: Design and analysis. Educational Technology & Society, 13(3), 70–77.
Chen, H. R & Tseng, H. F. (2012). Factors that influence acceptance of web-based e-learning systems for the in-service education of junior high school teachers in Taiwan. Evaluation and Program Planning, 35, 398-406.
Cho, V., Cheng, T. C. E., & Lai, W. M. J. (2009). The role of perceived user-interface design in continued usage intention of self-paced e-learning tools. Computers & Education, 53, 216–227.
Compeau, D. R., & Higgins, C. A. (1995). Application of social cognitive theory to training for computer skills. Information Systems Research, 6(2), 118–143.
Davis, F. D. (1986) A technology acceptance model for empirically testing new end-user information systems: Theory and results. (Doctoral dissertation, Sloan School of Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology).
Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1989). User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science, 35(8), 982-1003.
Fornell, D., & Lacker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50.
Heijden, H. (2003). Factors influencing the usage of websites: The case of a generic portal in The Netherlands. Information and Management Learning, 40(6), 541–549.
Hong, S. J. (2008). The study of Internet user’s intention of Internet learning and their Internet using behavior. Master Thesis, Asia University, Taiwan.
Jamieson-Proctor, R., Albion, P., Finger, G., Cavanagh, R., Fitzgerald, R., Bond, T., & Grimbeek, P. (2013). Development of the TTF TPACK Survey Instrument. Australian Educational Computing, 27(3),26-35.
Muhaqiqin, M. & Budi, I. (2019). Analysis of Factors Affecting Lecturer Acceptance of the E-Learning System in Universitas Lampung. 5th International Conference on Computing Engineering and Design (ICCED),1-6.
Motaghian, H. Hassanzadeh, A. & Moghadam, D. (2013). Factors affecting university instructors' adoption of web-based learning systems: Case study of Iran, Computers & Education, 61, 158-167.
Lee, J. S., Cho, H., Gay, G., Davidson, B., & Ingraffea, A. (2003). Technology acceptance and social networking in distance learning. Educational Technology and Society, 6(2), 50–61.
Lo, J.-L. (2004). A Study on Mobile Learning Device- Technology Acceptance Model (TAM). Master Thesis, National Central University, Taiwan.
Nambiar, D. (2020). The impact of online learning during COVID-19: students’ and teachers’ perspective. The International Journal of Indian Psychology, 8(2), 783-794.
Ong, C. S., Lai, J. Y., & Wang, Y. S. (2004). Factors affecting engineers’ acceptance of asynchronous e-learning systems in high-tech companies. Information & Management, 41(6), 795–804.
Orhan, G., & Beyhan, O. (2020). Teachers’ perceptions and teaching experiences on distance education through synchronous video conferencing during Covid-19 Pandemic. Social Sciences and Education Research Review, 7(1), 8-44.
Park, S. Y. (2009). An analysis of the technology acceptance model in understanding university students’ behavioral intention to use e-learning. Educational Technology & Society, 12(3), 150–162.
Revythi, A., Tselios, N. (2019). Extension of technology acceptance model by using system usability scale to assess behavioral intention to use e-learning. Education and Information Technologies, 24, 2341–2355.

Sanchez-Prieto, J. C., Olmos-Miguelanez, S. & Garcia-Penalvo, F. J. (2017). MLearning and pre-service teachers: An Assessment of the behavioral intention using an expanded TAM model.Computers in Human Behavior, 72, 644-654.
Tang, K. M. (2008). The study of probing into aborigine adult e-learning with technology acceptance model-take ‘‘Aborigine Cyber Institute’’ for instance. Master Thesis, National ChiNan University, Taiwan.
Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (1996). A model of the antecedents of perceived ease of use: Development and test. Decision Sciences, 27(3), 451–481.
Wang, W. T., & Wang, C. C. (2009). An empirical study of instructor adoption of web-based learning systems. Computers & Education, 53, 761–774.
Westberry, N. C., (2009). An activity theory analysis of social epistemologies within tertiary level e-Learning environments. University of Waikato, Hamilton, New Zealand.
Yang, S.-F. (2002). The constructionalisation and comparison of use intention model in electronic learning market. Master Thesis, Southern Taiwan University, Taiwan.
Young, S. C. (2003). Integrating ICT into second language education in a vocational high school. Journal of Computers Assisted Learning, 19, 447-461.
Yuen, A. H. K., & Ma, W. W. K. (2008). Exploring teacher acceptance of e-learning technology. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 36(3), 229–243.
The International Journal of Humanities
Volume 30, Issue 4
Autumn 2023
Pages 55-77