Study of the Correlation between Learner Autonomy and Multiple Intelligence

Document Type : Original Research

Authors
1 Ph.D, Tarbiat Modares University
2 Associate Professor, Tarbiat Modares University
3 Professor, Tarbiat Modares University
Abstract
In the framework of Howard Gardner's theory of multiple intelligences, we have studied the possible impact of emphasis on multidimensional intelligence on developing learner autonomy and we asked ourselves if a syllabus designed based on the learners' multiple intelligences help develop learner autonomy more effectively. Autonomy is considered to be a key factor in the promotion of the process of learning a foreign language, through enhancing learner motivation and self-confidence. Nevertheless, it is not always the focus of teaching. We believed it possible to help develop learner autonomy more efficiently, by emphasizing on individual intelligence profiles. Thus, we aim to establish, if and how effectively, an Iranian learner’s autonomy is influenced, when reached out to, through his multiple intelligences. In this research, a descriptive and synthetic approach will be applied. After presenting the main theoretical guidelines on which our research is based, we will share results of a field study conducted in this respect, on 30 adult Iranian learners of French as a foreign language (FFL) of the lower intermediate level (B1 of the CEFRL) and analyze the data quantitatively and qualitatively.

Keywords

Subjects


Alexander, R. (2020). A dialogic teaching companion. London UK/New York, NY: Routledge.
[2] Barfetty, M., & Beaujouin, P. (2005). Compréhension orale, Niveau 2. Paris: CLE international.
[3] Gardner, H. (1983). Frames of Mind: The Theory of Multiple Intelligences. New York: Basic Books.
[4] Gardner, H. (1999). Intelligence refraimed. Multiple Intelligences for the 21st centuray. New York: Basic Books.
[5] Germain, C. (1993). Evolution de l'enseignement des langues : 5000 ans d'histoire. Paris: CLE international.
[6] Henner-Stanehina, C., & Holec, H. (1977). Evaluation in Autonomous Learning Scheme. Mélanges Pédagogiques.
[7] Holec, H. (1979). Autonomie et apprentissage des langues étrangères. Conseil de l'Europe, Centre de Recherche et d'Applications Pédagogiques en Langues. Nancy: Hatier.
[8] Knibbeler, W. (1989). The Explorative-Creative Way: Implementation of a Humanistic Language Teaching Model. Language in Performance. Tübingen: Gunter Narr Verlag.
[9] Krahen, S., & Terrell. (1983). The Natural Approach. Oxford: Pregamon.
[10] Larsen-Freeman, D. (2004). Techniques and Principles in Language Teaching . New York: Oxford University Press.
[11] Lazear, D. (1991). Seven ways of teaching: the artistry of teaching with multiple intelligences. Palatine, IL: Skylight Publishing.
[12] Little, D. (2016). Learner autonomy and telecollaborative language learning. In S. Jager, M. Kurek, & B. O'Rourke (Ed.), New directions in telecollaborative research and practice: Selected papers from the second conference on telecollaboration in higher education (pp. 44-55). Reserch-publishing.net.
[13] Little, D. (2022). Language learner autonomy: Rethinking language teaching. Language Teaching, 55(1), 64-73.
[14] Procher, L. (1979). Les fonctions de l'évaluation dans un système européen d'unités capitalisables pour l'apprentissage des langues vivantes par les adultes. Symposium deI Ludzigshafen-am-Rhein. Strasbourg.
[15] Richards, J. C., & Rogers, T. S. (2001). Approaches and Methods in Language Teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
[16] Schwartz, B. (1977). Education Permanente. Strasbourg: Conseil de l'Europe.
[17] Tassinari, M. G. (2012, Mars). Evaluationg Lerner Autonomy: A dynamic Model with Descriptors. Retrieved from Studies in Self-Access Learning Journal: http://sisaljournal.org/archives/march12/tassinari
[18] Ushioda, E. (2011). Why autonomy? Insignts from motivation theory and research. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 5(2), 221-232.