A Contrastive Analysis of Reformists and Fundamentalists Press Texts Related to USA in Nuclear Talks: A Critical Discourse Analysis Approach Based on Van Leeuwen’s Socio-Semantic Model of Social Actors 2008

Authors
Shirin Gohari 1
Ferdows Aghagolzadeh 2
Hayat Ameri 3
1 Science and Research Branch of Azad University of Tehran
2 Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran
3 Center for Persian Language and Literature, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran
Abstract
In this article, a contrastive analysis of reformists and fundamentalists’ press texts, related to nuclear talks has been performed in specific periods of time, before and after the last round of nuclear talks between Islamic Republic of Iran and the 5+1 group, especially the United States’ related texts in Iran’s Persian newspapers as representatives of the two opposite discourses, from the perspective of the Critical Discourse Analysis approach by using socio-semantic features of Van Leeuwen’s model (2008). This study goes beyond the structural description of the discourse practices and examines the ways through which a system and structure make possible a special type of action. To do so, discursive texts of the two Iranian Persian publications belonging to two rival groups: E’temad as the representative of reformists and Keyhan, the fundamentalists’ representative, have been analyzed, both qualitatively and quantitatively. In response to the research questions (How is the linguistic realization of the discursive structures performed in the given texts? And are Socio-Semantic features determined by power relations?)The result shows that the opposite ideologies dominating the minds of journalists of the two political groups are reflected in the texts and statistical analysis of the corpus also states that the Socio-Semantic features are determined by different ideologies, related to power relations. In other words, language and discourse at underlying levels are laden with ideology, power relations and dominance, and at surface levels, with discursive features and structures.

Keywords

Subjects

[1] Aghagolzadeh, Ferdows, (2004). “Analysis Methodology in Critical Discourse Analysis”. Articles’ collection of 6th conference of Linguistics, Tehran: Literature & Foreign Language Faculty of AllamehTabatabaei University
[2]Aghagolzadeh, F. & Kheirabadi, R., (2008). A Linguistic Study of News Values in Iranian Press.The International Journal of Humanities of the Islamic Republic of Iran 15, 1-7.
[3] ________ (2006). Critical Discourse Analysis. Tehran: Farhang e goftman press.
[4] ________ (2010). Radio Discourse Analysis, based on Linguistic Theories and Strategies. Tehran: Tarh e Ayandeh.
[5] ________ (2012). “Description and Clarification of Ideological Linguistic Structures in Critical Discourse Analysis”,Linguistic and Comparative Literature Studies, No.2, TarbiatModares University.
[6] Amal Saleh, E. (2004). "The Representation of Social Actors in the EFL Textbooks in Iran". Unpublished PhD. Dissertation, Shiraz University, Shiraz.
[7] Asadi, M., (2012). “The Relationship between Discursive Structures and Ideology in Press Texts”. Doctoral Thesis.
[8] Dabir Moghaddam, M (2004). Theoretical Linguistics. Tehran: SAMT Press.
[9] Fairclough, N. & R. Wodak, (1997). "Critical Discourse Analysis", in: T. Van Dijk (Ed.). Discourse as Social Interaction, 258-284, sage.
[10] Halliday, M.A.K. & G. Kress, (1979). Language as Ideology. London: Routledge.
[11] Kress, G. and R. Hodge, (1979). Language as Ideology. London: Routledge.
[12] Kress, G. & T. Van Leeuwen, (2001). Multimodal Discourse – the Modes and Media of Contemporary Communication. London: Arnold.
[13] Laclau, E. &, C. Mouffe, (1985). Hegemony and Socialist Strategy: Towards a Radical Democratic Politics. London: Verso.
[14] Namjoo, P., (2003). "The Way Discursive Ideological Structures are related in two sets of Speeches on Terrorism". MA. Thesis, Shiraz University, Shiraz.
[15] Renkema, J., (2004). Introduction to Discourse Studies. Philadelphia, PA, USA: John Benjamins publishing Company.
[16] Schiffrin, Deborah, (1994), Approaches to Discourse. Oxford: Blackwell.
[17] Seif, L., (2004), "A Cross Cultural Investigation of the Representation of Social Actors in different Persian, British and American Discourses". MA. Thesis, Islamic Azad University, Shiraz.
[18] Soltani, A., (2005). Power, Discourse and Language. Tehran: Nei press.
[19] Yarmohammadi,L., (2004). Relations from the Critical Discourse Analysis Perspective. Tehran: Hermes.
[20] Van Dijk, T. A., (1988), News as Discourses. NewJersey: Lawrence.
[21] Van Leeuwen, T. A., (1993). "Genre and Field in CDA".Discourse and Society, Vol. 4, No. 2, Pp.193-225.
[22] __________ (1996). "The Representation of Social Actors", in Coldas- Coulthard, C. R. & Coulthard, M. (eds.), Text and Practices, Reading in CDA. London: Routledge.
[23] __________ (2008). Discourse & Practice: New Tools for Critical Discourse Analysis. London: Routledge.
The International Journal of Humanities
Volume 24, Issue 4
Autumn 2017
Pages 17-32