Search published articles
Showing 2 results for Immateriality
Sajad Sadatizadeh, Seyed Morteza Hosseini Shahroudi, Abdullah Niksirat,
Volume 24, Issue 2 (5-2017)
Abstract
Trying to understand the reality of the soul and its result (Self Knowledge Theology) has always attracted philosophers’ attention and has been regarded as one of the concerns of philosophical thinking. In this article, it is specified that the peripatetic philosophers, whether Greek or Islamic, have considered the soul as a chapter of naturalia and try mostly to comment on the soul’s powers and activities; they have not had any epistemological view of it. In contrast, Sheikh Eshragh closes the psychology to the theological discussions and looks at it from the epistemological point of view. His discussion is not about soul’s powers, but he provides a way to save the soul from the prison of the body and emancipate the human being from the darkness of material world. In the illuminationist philosophy, the theory of intuition was proposed for the first time (The substantial form), so it has discussed the nature of the soul from this viewpoint. Suhrawardi’s psychology isn’t a consequence of theoretical discussion, but it results from introspection and self-awareness that is possible only through the asceticism and controlling the dragon of carnal soul. It is soul which shows not only the Light of Lights, but it becomes divine and finally through this path he founds his luminous system. The system of being is realized through the epistemology of soul.
Volume 26, Issue 2 (1-2020)
Abstract
The subject of physical and spiritual resurrection is one of the most challenging theological issues among Islamic scholars. Meanwhile, Fakhr Razi and Allameh Tabataba'i believe in spiritual resurrection. In this study, we intend to analyze the content and approach of the two great thinkers about the most significant resurrection doubts. A closer look at the works of Razi reveals that his words are more explicit on physical resurrection. He responds to the Corrosive and Eaten of deceit and man. Since he considers restorations permissible and God Almighty, he concludes that Restoration of Non-being is not abstained. Razi, in the immateriality of the human soul Doubt, refers to the contradiction of the soul and the body, which is separated from him when he dies and ascends to the universe. Also, the verses quoted by him do not indicate that the soul that is other than the body is Immateriality or not Immateriality. In contrast, Tabatabai avoids the Corrosive and Eaten and the Restoration of Non-being Doubt. In his view, there is nothing in the body and soul, because the body changes to other elements, and the soul is a Immateriality thing that is not corrupted by the death of the body. Tabataba'i, in response to the immateriality of the human soul of self-objectification Doubt, considers the regards the object as object, not matter. He believes that our body in the resurrection is like the earthly body. He also considers being objective in the self and preserving the human personality.
