Search published articles
Showing 2 results for Dogmatism
Volume 9, Issue 36 (12-2012)
Abstract
Formalistic criticism was the most important approach at the turn of 20th century that was originated from the modernism. The last decades of nineteenth and the early twentieth centuries, were the periods of denial and rejection as well as break-away from the past literary and artistic traditions. Modernism tried to break the ideology of ancient art and created "new" and "modern literature". For that reason, in the early twentieth century, thinkers made anti-cinema, anti-theater and anti-novel efforts to create a kind of anti-artistic views. The formalism in this tumultuous scenario raised the flag to combat traditional thoughts in literary and artistic domain. Is today, in the existing circumstances, formalism can be used for literary criticism ?
In this paper, the manner of emergence of formalism in the early twentieth century literature is studied and techniques and theories are compared with the Persian rhetoric. Undoubtedly, today, after the passing of nearly one century of the emergence of formalism, it should be noted that although formalists created new theories, almost all
stages of their works are clouded with dogmatic fundamentalism. Today, in order to pay tribute to their efforts, formalistic critical school, with an absolute perspective, must virtually be placed in museum of artistic and literary criticism and cannot be used as an ultimate and final method in criticism.
Hamidreza Mahboobi Arani,
Volume 28, Issue 1 (1-2021)
Abstract
In the preface to his Critique of Pure Reason, Kant characterizes his own critical metaphysics as the main opponent of dogmatism, which inevitably results in the assertion of conflicting dogmas especially about the existence of God, the freedom of the will and the immortality of the soul. Simultaneously, Kant subtly distinguishes his critical philosophy from three other stances opposing dogmatism: the skepticism of Descartes and Hume, the empiricism of John Lock, and the indifferentism of thinkers who, without rejecting metaphysical assertions, refute any attempt to argue for them systematically and rigorously. Refusing indifferentism, Kant somehow admits a commonsensical view similar to that of indifferentism regarding principal issues of metaphysics. Touching very briefly on Kant’s view, the paper examines Nietzsche's take on especially the issue of the existence of the Christian God. Defending a kind of stance similar to skepticism or even, in some aspects, to indifferentism, Nietzsche’s chief endeavor is to look at the issue from the different perspectives of genealogical and axiological critiques in order to pave the way for an entire overlooking the issue. In this respect, such an endeavor results in a stance contrary to Kant’s commonsensical position, ending up in Nietzsche’s talk of the Death of God and the Death of the True World.
