Volume 15, Issue 2 (2008)                   IQBQ 2008, 15(2): 127-155 | Back to browse issues page

XML Persian Abstract Print

National Research Institute for Science Policy (Iran)
Abstract:   (5142 Views)
Jonathan Dancy advocates a radical particularist theory of ethics. Arguing against a variety of generalist doctrines, he maintains that there are no moral principles and that our ethical decisions are highly context-dependent: they are made case by case, without the support of such principles. In this paper, drawing on a number of theoretical concepts used in science as well as the philosophy of science I shall try to develop a moderate generalist-pluralist model. This model, I shall argue, is less vulnerable to Dancy’s criticisms and better equipped, in comparison to Dancy’s own model, to deal with moral cases.
Full-Text [PDF 285 kb]   (2245 Downloads)    

Received: 2007/04/7 | Accepted: 2007/07/17 | Published: 2008/05/30